🔍 Read the full analysis: Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Brings Faster AI, Lower Costs, And Longer Clips on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get business pricing on tech for your team
- Business-only prices and quantity discounts
- Tax-exempt purchasing
- Multiple users, one account, clear invoices
TL;DR
Google announced Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash on Nov. 5, adding video generation and editing for clips up to 15 seconds. Google says 720p output costs $0.07 per second, 30% less than version 1.1, but the announcement did not include independent performance comparisons or prices for other resolutions.
Google announced Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash on Nov. 5, introducing video generation and editing for clips up to 15 seconds and a stated 720p price of $0.07 per second, as detailed in the original analysis. Google says that rate is 30% below the price of Gemini Omni 1.1 Flash; the release matters to developers and businesses making short videos, though the company did not provide independent tests of the model’s performance.
The new model raises the maximum native clip length from 10 seconds in Omni 1.1 to 15 seconds, according to Google. Users can choose a duration in one-second increments from three to 15 seconds. The company says they can also revise a generated clip through follow-up prompts—for example, asking to change a background or lighting—rather than creating the entire video again.
Google lists 720p video at $0.07 per second and describes that as a 30% price reduction compared with Omni 1.1. It says users can draft at 360p or 720p and upscale selected clips to 1080p or 4K, but the announcement supplied no prices for those resolutions or for upscaling. Google also says Provisioned Throughput is available and that generated outputs carry an imperceptible SynthID watermark.
The company says the model can use reference images, motion clips up to three seconds and audio cues. It describes improvements in following those references, preserving details across frames, speech, lip-sync and camera movement. Google’s announcement offered examples of intended uses, including product videos and scenes with multiple speaking characters, but did not include standardized comparisons or independent evaluations of those capabilities.
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash Longer clips, lower stated cost
Google’s update brings longer video generation and conversational editing. Its price and quality claims still need independent evaluation.
What changes for creators
The update targets short video workflows that need multiple versions and revisions.
More room for a scene
The maximum rises from 10 to 15 seconds, with duration selectable in one-second increments.
Revise with prompts
Users can request changes such as a new background or lighting adjustment without regenerating the whole clip.
Guide the generation
Google says the model can use reference images, motion clips up to three seconds, and audio cues.
Where it is rolling out
Google says access is beginning across its products and developer platforms.
What the price covers
The announced rate applies to 720p video; other resolution and upscaling costs were not provided.
Google says creators can choose either resolution for drafts.
The stated $0.07-per-second rate is for 720p video.
Selected clips can be upscaled to 1080p or 4K, but those prices were not stated.
Claims awaiting testing
Google describes improvements, but the announcement supplies no independent benchmarks or standardized comparisons.
- Better reference following and continuity
- Improvements to speech, lip-sync, and camera movement
- Edits can preserve scene details across changes
- Reliability across varied scenes and demanding footage
- Failure rates and time saved in real workflows
- Total cost, including higher resolutions and upscaling
Lower Rates for Short Video Work
The changes target practical constraints in short-form production: clip length, repeated revisions and per-second generation costs. A 15-second ceiling gives users more room than the previous 10-second limit, while conversational editing could let a team request variations without rebuilding a scene. If the edits reliably preserve the details users want, that could reduce production work for ads, explainers and social videos.
The cost reduction may be relevant to organizations generating many clips through an API. But the listed rate is specifically for 720p output, and the 30% comparison is only against Google’s previous model—not other video services. The total cost of a project could also depend on resolution, upscaling and how many attempts are needed to get an acceptable result. The announcement does not quantify time saved, edit success rates or full production costs, so the practical savings remain unmeasured.
Products Worth Considering
Bose SoundLink Flex Bluetooth Speaker (2nd Gen) – Portable Outdoor Speaker with Hi‑Fi Audio, Waterproof and Dustproof, USB‑C, Up to 12 Hours
EcoFlow Delta 3 Portable Power Station – 1024 Wh, 1800 W
EcoFlow Delta 3 Max Portable Power Station – 2048 Wh LiFePO4 Battery, 2400 W Output (3400 W X‑Boost)
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
What Changes From Omni 1.1
Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash follows Google’s Omni 1.1 video model, which the company said generated clips up to 10 seconds long. The new version’s longer limit and follow-up editing are the clearest changes described in the announcement. Google frames them alongside updates to reference following, visual continuity and generated speech.
Google says Omni 1.2 Flash is rolling out through the Gemini API and Gemini for business, and points developers to Google AI Studio for prototyping. The company also names Flow and Google Vids among the products where the model is available or rolling out. The announcement does not provide a platform-by-platform schedule, so access may not arrive for every user at the same time.
“Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash introduces native 15-second video creation, multi-turn conversational editing capabilities, and enhanced reference following.”
— Google DeepMind, in its Nov. 5 product announcement
Performance and Pricing Still Open
The announcement did not include independent benchmarks, detailed testing methods or comparative failure rates for continuity, reference following, speech or lip-sync. It is not yet clear how consistently the model preserves faces, text, products or scene details in demanding projects, or how often a requested follow-up edit produces the intended result.
Google said development continues on fast sports action, rapid script changes and complex physics. The company did not give prices for 360p, 1080p or 4K output, explain the cost of upscaling, or specify when every platform and region will receive access. Those omissions leave both the full cost and the availability timeline uncertain.
Access and Testing to Watch
Google says the rollout is beginning across its products and developer platforms, but has not announced a schedule for access on each service or account. Developers can test the model through the Gemini API and Google AI Studio, while Google identifies business and video products as part of the rollout.
The next useful evidence will come from tests on varied footage and workflows, including difficult motion and repeated edits. Clearer resolution and upscaling prices would help users estimate total costs. Google says it will continue work on fast action, rapid script changes and complex physics, but has not announced dates for those improvements.
Key Questions
What is Gemini Omni 1.2 Flash?
It is Google’s AI video model announced on Nov. 5. Google says it can generate and edit clips up to 15 seconds long.
How much does 720p video cost?
Google lists 720p generation at $0.07 per second, which it says is 30% less than the price of Omni 1.1. The announcement does not list prices for other resolutions or upscaling.
What editing features are new?
Google says users can make changes through follow-up prompts, such as adjusting lighting or replacing a background, instead of regenerating an entire clip. Independent results on how reliably those edits work were not included.
Where can users access the model?
Google says it is rolling out through the Gemini API and Gemini for business, and points developers to Google AI Studio. Flow and Google Vids are also named, but a complete access schedule was not provided.
Have the claimed quality improvements been independently verified?
Not in the supplied announcement. Google claims improvements to reference following, continuity, speech, lip-sync and camera movement, but it did not provide independent benchmarks or standardized comparisons.
Primary source: Google AI · via ThorstenMeyerAI.com
